VipEntitlementCheckRequest vip.entitlement-check-request@1
Generated at from
openvibe-contracts v0.53.0 and
openvibe-sdk v0.11.0.
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Owner
- vip
- Visibility
- first-party
- Status
- active
- Compatibility
- backward
- Schema
https://openvibe.network/contracts/vip/entitlement-check-request.v1.json
vip.entitlement-check-request@1: the question of vip.entitlement.check on OpenVibe.VIP. POST /api/v1/entitlements/check: { creator, subject?, mode?, product? }; GET /api/v1/entitlements/check takes the same fields in its query string and no body. creator is a user SubjectRef, usr_ id (asked of Billing even when VIP has never seen the creator) or VIP username; subject is the member (required for services; a person asks about themselves). mode auto (default: the projection when fresh, else Billing), projection (never asks Billing) or authoritative (always asks Billing). product (a service id such as chat or blog) adds what the membership means there. Refusals are problem+json: 422 vip.invalid_input (no creator VIP can resolve, a bad product) or vip.invalid_subject; 403 capability.denied or vip.not_yours. Unknown fields are ignored.
Fields
This schema has no named fields.
Examples
From the contract's own test fixtures: valid ones validate, rejected ones must fail.
Valid: get
{}Valid: post
{
"creator": {
"type": "user",
"id": "usr_01JAB2C3D4E5F6G7H8J9K0MNPQ"
},
"subject": {
"type": "user",
"id": "usr_01JAB2C3D4E5F6G7H8J9K0MNPR"
},
"mode": "auto",
"product": "chat"
}Rejected: bad-product
{
"creator": "moosefan",
"product": "Chat!"
}Validate
const contracts = require('openvibe-contracts');
contracts.validate('vip.entitlement-check-request@1', value); // { valid, errors: [{ path, message }] }